For all things environmental in Western New York – news, events, outdoor places, and much more!

Home  >  The Blog  >  Can Hydraulic Fracturing Help Local Communities?

The Blog

Can Hydraulic Fracturing Help Local Communities?

A Large Influx of Male Workers Tip Community Balance

Hydraulic fracturing, sometimes called “hydro-fracking”, has been making big news in our state recently.  The process involves extracting gas using a well that drills thousands of feet below the earth’s surface.  The drill is then directed horizontally to reach pockets of natural gas trapped in rock formations.  In our region, hydraulic fracturing is used to capture gas from a black shale rock formation called Marcellus Shale.

The New York State Senate passed a moratorium on all hydraulic fracturing operations in the entire state until spring of 2011.  The bill will allow time for the United States Environmental Protection Agency to study the effects of the process on drinking water and human health.   For details on the EPA’s study, click here.

The energy industry asked the county to lift requirements on temporary housing units, called "man camps".  Local citizens fear that they will have no options to prevent oil and gas companies from bringing in workers to live on their property. - From The Colorado Independent News Network

Advocates of the gas extraction technique say that hydraulic fracturing will boost the economy by creating local jobs, and that drilling in the United States will decrease the nations’ dependence on foreign oil.  Opponents argue that the health effects caused by water, air and land pollution, in addition to complicated land ownership issues surrounding mineral rights, far outweigh the benefits to American citizens.

One of the lesser known phenomena surrounding hydraulic fracturing is the introduction of a large male workforce in small towns where drilling operations are established.  The introduction of “Man Camps” in rural communities can have significant impact on nearby communities.

Man Camps, referring to the temporary housing facilities commonly set up by oil and gas drilling companies, provide food and shelter for its employees at project locations.  These camps are built to house anywhere between six to a few hundred men together for months at a time, and are necessary because the employees may otherwise struggle to find any place to live at all.

According to industry managers, the sites are highly regulated, with a zero tolerance policy for drugs and alcohol, and they randomly drug test and perform quarterly searches for drugs and guns.  Oil and gas workers have been known to abuse these substances, posing safety and security risks to the host community.

Although the man camps were established to reduce potential safety risks for communities, the crime in surrounding areas, including sexual assault on women, has increased.

Some facilities are very large, housing most of the workers together in one place far away from people – say in a wilderness area – which protects other citizens but which may disrupt natural habitats.  Other times, when drilling corporations make deals with landowners to drill on their private properties, smaller versions of these camps, usually for 6-8 employees, are built right near a person’s home.  In Garfield County, Colorado, the gas industry pushed for man camps on private property without county oversight.

In Colorado, landowners find themselves worrying about strangers living so close to their homes, especially if they have families.  Some people are angry that the oil and gas companies seem to be getting more rights to private properties than the property owners themselves.

If they don’t move into these units workers actually move into existing communities around the drill site.  While this may be good for local businesses throughout the duration of the extraction process, this solution can create housing problems.  Since the industry can afford to pay higher prices for rent and housing than many existing community residents, housing prices have increased.

This sudden price increase creates difficulties for those already living in places like Bradford County, Pennsylvania, where prices of rent have doubled or even tripled when the industry came to town.  Prices have climbed to the point where even moderate income families cannot afford housing.

Because of this disparity, landlords in Bradford County are not renewing leases with previous tenants because they know that they can get more money by signing on industry workers.  Waiting lists for public housing and homeless assistance programs have grown rapidly here.  Residents can’t even find rooms in local motels, as they are at capacity due to out-of-town employees housed by the industry.

Can hydraulic fracturing help local economies?  One Pennsylvania blogger and the Huffington Post wonder how many local jobs will be created when the existence of man camps and extensive rentals cater to the needs of so many outside workers.

The impermanence of these drilling sites also means that a short-term economic boom may in the long run leave these local communities worse-off once the gas industry leaves.  Each well constructed can be fractured anywhere from 10-20 times before it is no longer used.  Many of these wells are constructed in a community or region at one time, and operations last about 5-7 years, even over 15 years in some cases.   However long, this means that these new settlements are temporary for the duration that gas can be extracted from the rock.   Are the man camp communities our modern day boomtowns, thriving for short periods of time, only to be inevitably abandoned when all of the riches have been exploited?

New York State is the first state to actually halt the hydro fracturing business from drilling in order to examine if its harmful effects are worth it, when it has been customary for the drills to happen first and the state to ask questions later.  We are lucky that we have some time to really take a look at both sides of the coin.

Interested in learning more about hydraulic fracturing?  Educational events are occurring throughout the region that explore both sides of the issue, visit the GrowWNY event calendar to learn more.

 

 

7 Comments

  1. There is a lot of hysteria directed at the issue of gas drilling and hydraulic fracturing. My thought is the biggest problem is treating the water (for eventual disposal) that is removed from the wells after fracturing. Another problem, is the source of the water used for the fracking. Certainly, the general destruction to the land that accompanies moving heavy equipment onto a drilling site is also a concern.

    A well engineered gas well should not contaminate shallow aquifers. It is clear that oversight by regulatory agencies prior to drilling, during the drilling and afterwards is very important.

    I think 'man camps' rate very low on the list of potential concerns. Really low.
  2. I agree that there are more serious consquences of hydraulic fracturing than "man camps." But I've recently talked with some residents of a Pennsylvania community where "fracking" is going on, and they felt that the many side effects on their communities were very important. They complained about the housing problems mentioned in this article. They were even more vociferous about the increase in traffic caused by the many, many water trucks and other equipment trucks required by the "fracking" process. I think they felt that if they had known only about the housing and traffic problems that would follow, they would have chosen not to allow hydraulic fracturing in their community. These are side effects that may pale in comparison to the pollution and health problems that "fracking" communities have experienced, but they may be sufficient to make prohibiting the practice the only reasonable plan.
  3. First, it has a negative impact on the native ecology and wildlife to go in and destroy a wonderful place like Zoar Valley. There are native plants that aren't found anywhere else and there are many old growth trees that would be chopped down to make make their equiptment roads for access to the fracking sites. Second of all the water pollution is terrible. Some people have stated they could literally ignite their tap water in their homes. I personally don't want my children, the local school, and community members to ingest the toxins related to fracking. Third, I am involved in an oraganization to help restore, protect, and conserve our Great Lakes and Cattaraugus Creek is a main tributary leading to Lake Erie. I don't want polluted sediment and toxic water pollution seeping into our ecosystem and destroying the next generations future just to line the States pocket because legislators have outrageous incomes and uncontrollable spending habits.
  4. See http://www.theoildrum.com/node/7075. When you combine very hard, dangerous work done by people working very long hours far away from home, and when few loacls are hired with really marginal economics, this is not good. Treating people like this leads to all kinds of people related problems -the movie "Outland" is a classic warning about corporate greed pushing the limits and this leads to lots of problems. And this is just the tip of the iceberg. Alcoholism runs rampant in these situations, just for starts.

    The Maecellus shale gas is really a speculation play, with only some chump change falling off the money wagon to the local community. There is way more money to be made via wind turbine installations and biomass harvesting/power plants, as well as the use of biogas to make electricity. The methane extracted from the fracked gas is mostly oriented to making electricity, and when that is gone, so too will the chump change, and a big mess will be left behind.
  5. Some background on "Outland" - see [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outland_(film)]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outland_(film)[/url].
    And then there is this recent review of the 60 Minutes (11-14-2010) segment on fracking (with link to this segment): http://www.energybulletin.net/stories/2010-11-17/sixty-lame-minutes. And this one on the Fracking Viability Illusion - Marcellus gas shale is an ASSET PLAY, where small drillers like Range Resources and Atlas (just acquired by Chevron for $4 billion CASH) are dangling themselves before the cash rich but hydrocarbon asset poor petroleum majors: http://www.energybulletin.net/stories/2010-11-17/shale-gas-shell-game.
    Don't fall for the illusion that the Marcellus is "clean energy" or for our country's "energy security". If you do, please subtract at least 30 points off of your purported IQ.
  6. Here's a brand new man camp built by Chesapeake: http://www.pressconnects.com/article/20101118/NEWS11/11180344/1006/
    @Tim: Yes, water is a huge issue, however, the problems with natural gas exploration, production and distribution are many and multifaceted. It's easy to focus on the environmental issues and completely overlook the community and social issues. Man camps are one facet that needs attention.
  7. [cont'd] Some of the research on energy boomtowns is over 30 years old, but the results indicate that local communities should expect severe strains on their infrastructure: housing shortages; road degradation; increased crime and stress on court & jail systems; increased use of fire, ambulance & police services; etc. See http://nercrd.psu.edu/Publications/rdppapers/rdp43.pdf . All these things are coming true in northern Pennsylvania - we're seeing prostitution, increased DUIs, and murder, our housing costs have doubled to quadrupled, roads have ruts that are impassable for school buses and locals without 4-wheel drive, our volunteer firefighters and EMTs are responding to more calls than they've ever faced.

      • >:o
      • :-[
      • :'(
      • :-(
      • :-D
      • :-*
      • :-)
      • :P
      • :\
      • 8-)
      • ;-)



    • Click to get a new image.